↓ Skip to main content

Staffing level: a determinant of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Staffing level: a determinant of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia
Published in
Critical Care, July 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc5974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stéphane Hugonnet, Ilker Uçkay, Didier Pittet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Unknown 77 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 7 8%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Other 28 33%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,365
of 77,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.