↓ Skip to main content

Association of neuron-specific enolase values with outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors is dependent on the time of sample collection

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of neuron-specific enolase values with outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors is dependent on the time of sample collection
Published in
Critical Care, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1766-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dagmar Vondrakova, Andreas Kruger, Marek Janotka, Filip Malek, Vlasta Dudkova, Petr Neuzil, Petr Ostadal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Researcher 10 16%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 45%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,873,336
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,452
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,846
of 327,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#59
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.