↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional investigation of the quality of selected medicines in Cambodia in 2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cross-sectional investigation of the quality of selected medicines in Cambodia in 2010
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoko Yoshida, Mohiuddin Hussain Khan, Hitomi Tabata, Eav Dararath, Tey Sovannarith, Heng Bun Kiet, Nam Nivanna, Manabu Akazawa, Hirohito Tsuboi, Tsuyoshi Tanimoto, Kazuko Kimura

Abstract

Access to good-quality medicines in many countries is largely hindered by the rampant circulation of spurious/falsely labeled/falsified/counterfeit (SFFC) and substandard medicines. In 2006, the Ministry of Health of Cambodia, in collaboration with Kanazawa University, Japan, initiated a project to combat SFFC medicines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,348,068
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#63
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,559
of 194,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them