You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A cross-sectional investigation of the quality of selected medicines in Cambodia in 2010
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2050-6511-15-13 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Naoko Yoshida, Mohiuddin Hussain Khan, Hitomi Tabata, Eav Dararath, Tey Sovannarith, Heng Bun Kiet, Nam Nivanna, Manabu Akazawa, Hirohito Tsuboi, Tsuyoshi Tanimoto, Kazuko Kimura |
Abstract |
Access to good-quality medicines in many countries is largely hindered by the rampant circulation of spurious/falsely labeled/falsified/counterfeit (SFFC) and substandard medicines. In 2006, the Ministry of Health of Cambodia, in collaboration with Kanazawa University, Japan, initiated a project to combat SFFC medicines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 68 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 28% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 28% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,795,018
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#82
of 447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,874
of 223,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.