↓ Skip to main content

Is essential newborn care provided by institutions and after home births? Analysis of prospective data from community trials in rural South Asia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is essential newborn care provided by institutions and after home births? Analysis of prospective data from community trials in rural South Asia
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Pagel, Audrey Prost, Munir Hossen, Kishwar Azad, Abdul Kuddus, Swati Sarbani Roy, Nirmala Nair, Prasanta Tripathy, Naomi Saville, Aman Sen, Catherine Sikorski, Dharma S Manandhar, Anthony Costello, Sonya Crowe

Abstract

Provision of essential newborn care (ENC) can save many newborn lives in poor resource settings but coverage is far from universal and varies by country and place of delivery. Understanding gaps in current coverage and where coverage is good, in different contexts and places of delivery, could make a valuable contribution to the future design of interventions to reduce neonatal mortality. We sought to describe the coverage of essential newborn care practices for births in institutions, at home with a skilled birth attendant, and at home without a skilled birth attendant (SBA) in rural areas of Bangladesh, Nepal, and India.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Psychology 6 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 63 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,375,469
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#640
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,337
of 223,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#18
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.