You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-47 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc T Kiviniemi |
| Abstract |
Blended learning approaches, in which in-person and online course components are combined in a single course, are rapidly increasing in health sciences education. Evidence for the relative effectiveness of blended learning versus more traditional course approaches is mixed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 11% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 79 | 20% |
| Unknown | 112 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 67 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 25% |
| Unknown | 123 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,622,789
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,352
of 3,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,651
of 223,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#29
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.