↓ Skip to main content

The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaspal S Taggar, Tim Coleman, Sarah Lewis, Lisa Szatkowski

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,771,791
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,166
of 14,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,799
of 164,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.