↓ Skip to main content

The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-329
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaspal S Taggar, Tim Coleman, Sarah Lewis, Lisa Szatkowski

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 21 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,786,397
of 17,365,229 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,097
of 11,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,736
of 273,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,365,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.