↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Impact of long-lasting, insecticidal nets on anaemia and prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum among children under five years in areas with highly resistant malaria vectors

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Summary Policy documents Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of long-lasting, insecticidal nets on anaemia and prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum among children under five years in areas with highly resistant malaria vectors
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-76
Pubmed ID
24581394
Authors

Filémon T Tokponnon, Aurore Hounto Ogouyémi, Yolande Sissinto, Arthur Sovi, Virgile Gnanguenon, Sylvie Cornélie, Adicath Adéola Adéothy, Razaki Ossè, Abel Wakpo, Dina Gbénou, Mariam Oke, Dorothée Kinde-Gazard, Immo Kleinschmidt, Martin C Akogbeto, Achille Massougbodji

Abstract

The widespread use of insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) leads to the development of vector resistance to insecticide. This resistance can reduce the effectiveness of LLIN-based interventions and perhaps reverse progress in reducing malaria morbidity. To prevent such difficulty, it is important to know the real impact of resistance in the effectiveness of mosquito nets. Therefore, an assessment of LLIN efficacy was conducted in malaria prevention among children in high and low resistance areas.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 32 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,025,827
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#728
of 5,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,848
of 222,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#19
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.