You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of long-lasting, insecticidal nets on anaemia and prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum among children under five years in areas with highly resistant malaria vectors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Filémon T Tokponnon, Aurore Hounto Ogouyémi, Yolande Sissinto, Arthur Sovi, Virgile Gnanguenon, Sylvie Cornélie, Adicath Adéola Adéothy, Razaki Ossè, Abel Wakpo, Dina Gbénou, Mariam Oke, Dorothée Kinde-Gazard, Immo Kleinschmidt, Martin C Akogbeto, Achille Massougbodji |
| Abstract |
The widespread use of insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) leads to the development of vector resistance to insecticide. This resistance can reduce the effectiveness of LLIN-based interventions and perhaps reverse progress in reducing malaria morbidity. To prevent such difficulty, it is important to know the real impact of resistance in the effectiveness of mosquito nets. Therefore, an assessment of LLIN efficacy was conducted in malaria prevention among children in high and low resistance areas. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,025,827
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#728
of 5,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,848
of 222,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#19
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.