↓ Skip to main content

Deep targeted sequencing of 12 breast cancer susceptibility regions in 4611 women across four different ethnicities

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep targeted sequencing of 12 breast cancer susceptibility regions in 4611 women across four different ethnicities
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13058-016-0772-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Lindström, Akweley Ablorh, Brad Chapman, Alexander Gusev, Gary Chen, Constance Turman, A. Heather Eliassen, Alkes L. Price, Brian E. Henderson, Loic Le Marchand, Oliver Hofmann, Christopher A. Haiman, Peter Kraft

Abstract

Although genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of disease susceptibility regions, the underlying causal mechanism in these regions is not fully known. It is likely that the GWAS signal originates from one or many as yet unidentified causal variants. Using next-generation sequencing, we characterized 12 breast cancer susceptibility regions identified by GWASs in 2288 breast cancer cases and 2323 controls across four populations of African American, European, Japanese, and Hispanic ancestry. After genotype calling and quality control, we identified 137,530 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs); of those, 87.2 % had a minor allele frequency (MAF) <0.005. For SNVs with MAF >0.005, we calculated the smallest number of SNVs needed to obtain a posterior probability set (PPS) such that there is 90 % probability that the causal SNV is included. We found that the PPS for two regions, 2q35 and 11q13, contained less than 5 % of the original SNVs, dramatically decreasing the number of potentially causal SNVs. However, we did not find strong evidence supporting a causal role for any individual SNV. In addition, there were no significant gene-based rare SNV associations after correcting for multiple testing. This study illustrates some of the challenges faced in fine-mapping studies in the post-GWAS era, most importantly the large sample sizes needed to identify rare-variant associations or to distinguish the effects of strongly correlated common SNVs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%