↓ Skip to main content

Renewing focus on family planning service quality globally

Overview of attention for article published in Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renewing focus on family planning service quality globally
Published in
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40834-016-0021-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy L. Hancock, Gretchen S. Stuart, Jennifer H. Tang, Carla J. Chibwesha, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Benjamin H. Chi

Abstract

Reducing the global unmet need for contraception is currently a priority for many governments, multi-lateral initiatives, non-governmental organizations, and donors. Evidence strongly suggests that the provision of quality family planning services can increase uptake, prevalence, and continuation of contraception. While an accepted framework to define the components of family planning service quality exists, translating this framework into assessment tools that are accessible, easily utilized, and valid for service providers has remained a challenge. We propose new approaches to improve the standardization and accessibility of family planning service quality assessment tools to simplify family planning service quality evaluation. With easier approaches to program evaluation, quality improvements can be performed more swiftly to help increase uptake and continuation of contraception to improve the health of women and their families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Lecturer 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 38 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 37 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,560,904
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#64
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,410
of 353,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them