↓ Skip to main content

HLA-check: evaluating HLA data from SNP information

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HLA-check: evaluating HLA data from SNP information
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1746-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Jeanmougin, Josselin Noirel, Cédric Coulonges, Jean-François Zagury

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region of the human genome, and specifically the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, play a major role in numerous human diseases. With the recent progress of sequencing methods (eg, Next-Generation Sequencing, NGS), the accurate genotyping of this region has become possible but remains relatively costly. In order to obtain the HLA information for the millions of samples already genotyped by chips in the past ten years, efficient bioinformatics tools, such as SNP2HLA or HIBAG, have been developed that infer HLA information from the linkage disequilibrium existing between HLA alleles and SNP markers in the MHC region. In this study, we first used ShapeIT and Impute2 to implement an imputation method akin to SNP2HLA and found a comparable quality of imputation on a European dataset. More importantly, we developed a new tool, HLA-check, that allows for the detection of aberrant HLA allele calling with regard to the SNP genotypes in the region. Adding this tool to the HLA imputation software increases dramatically their accuracy, especially for HLA class I genes. Overall, HLA-check was able to identify a limited number of implausible HLA typings (less than 10%) in a population, and these samples can then either be removed or be retyped by NGS for HLA association analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Computer Science 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,449,640
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,782
of 7,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,088
of 315,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#36
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.