↓ Skip to main content

A description of malaria sentinel surveillance: a case study in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A description of malaria sentinel surveillance: a case study in Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua O Yukich, Jessica Butts, Melody Miles, Yemane Berhane, Honelgn Nahusenay, Joseph L Malone, Gunawardena Dissanayake, Richard Reithinger, Joseph Keating

Abstract

In the context of the massive scale up of malaria interventions, there is increasing recognition that the current capacity of routine malaria surveillance conducted in most African countries through integrated health management information systems is inadequate. The timeliness of reporting to higher levels of the health system through health management information systems is often too slow for rapid action on focal infectious diseases such as malaria. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) describe the implementation of a malaria sentinel surveillance system in Ethiopia to help fill this gap; 2) describe data use for epidemic detection and response as well as programmatic decision making; and 3) discuss lessons learned in the context of creating and running this system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 26%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,584,918
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,704
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,476
of 225,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#61
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.