↓ Skip to main content

Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Ciliacus, Marieke van der Zalm, Sophie E Truijens, Tom H Hasaart, Victor J Pop, Simone M Kuppens

Abstract

Objective was to determine whether fear for external cephalic version (ECV) and depression are associated with the success rate of ECV in women with a breech presentation at term.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Psychology 6 10%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,191,572
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,692
of 4,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,830
of 221,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#74
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.