↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the relationship between the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and EQ-5D

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modelling the relationship between the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and EQ-5D
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-12-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan Wailoo, Monica Hernandez Alava, Antonio Escobar Martinez

Abstract

Economic evaluation typically is conducted using health state utilities to estimate treatment benefits. However, such outcomes are often missing from studies of clinical effectiveness. This study aims to bridge that gap by providing appropriate methods to link values from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) to the EQ-5D utility instrument.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,416,475
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,453
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,157
of 236,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.