You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-paying partnerships and its association with HIV risk behavior, program exposure and service utilization among female sex workers in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-248 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra Mary Travasso, Bidhubhusan Mahapatra, Niranjan Saggurti, Suneeta Krishnan |
| Abstract |
In India, HIV prevention programs have focused on female sex workers' (FSWs') sexual practices vis-à-vis commercial partners leading to important gains in HIV prevention. However, it has become apparent that further progress is contingent on a better understanding of FSWs' sexual risks in the context of their relationships with non-paying partners. In this paper, we explored the association between FSWs' non-paying partner status, including cohabitation and HIV risk behaviors, program exposure and utilization of program services. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,330,123
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,434
of 14,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,819
of 221,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#172
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.