You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human rights education in patient care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Health Reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40985-017-0061-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna N. Erdman |
| Abstract |
This article explores how human rights education in the health professions can build knowledge, change culture, and empower advocacy. Through a study of educational initiatives in the field, the article analyzes different methods by which health professionals come to see the relevance of human rights norms for their work, to habituate these norms in everyday practice, and to espouse these norms in advocacy for social justice. The article seeks to show the transformative potential of education for human rights in patient care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Canada | 3 | 19% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,114,761
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#83
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,317
of 324,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.