↓ Skip to main content

Candidate genes and functional noncoding variants identified in a canine model of obsessive-compulsive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candidate genes and functional noncoding variants identified in a canine model of obsessive-compulsive disorder
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruqi Tang, Hyun Noh, Dongqing Wang, Snaevar Sigurdsson, Ross Swofford, Michele Perloski, Margaret Duxbury, Edward E Patterson, Julie Albright, Marta Castelhano, Adam Auton, Adam R Boyko, Guoping Feng, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Elinor K Karlsson

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a severe mental disease manifested in time-consuming repetition of behaviors, affects 1 to 3% of the human population. While highly heritable, complex genetics has hampered attempts to elucidate OCD etiology. Dogs suffer from naturally occurring compulsive disorders that closely model human OCD, manifested as an excessive repetition of normal canine behaviors that only partially responds to drug therapy. The limited diversity within dog breeds makes identifying underlying genetic factors easier.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 30 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Other 15 10%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 19 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2021.
All research outputs
#120,950
of 19,016,777 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#53
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,238
of 197,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,016,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them