↓ Skip to main content

Comparative transcriptomics of Atlantic Salmo salar, chum Oncorhynchus keta and pink salmon O. gorbuscha during infections with salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative transcriptomics of Atlantic Salmo salar, chum Oncorhynchus keta and pink salmon O. gorbuscha during infections with salmon lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben JG Sutherland, Kim W Koczka, Motoshige Yasuike, Stuart G Jantzen, Ryosuke Yazawa, Ben F Koop, Simon RM Jones

Abstract

Salmon species vary in susceptibility to infections with the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis). Comparing mechanisms underlying responses in susceptible and resistant species is important for estimating impacts of infections on wild salmon, selective breeding of farmed salmon, and expanding our knowledge of fish immune responses to ectoparasites. Herein we report three L. salmonis experimental infection trials of co-habited Atlantic Salmo salar, chum Oncorhynchus keta and pink salmon O. gorbuscha, profiling hematocrit, blood cortisol concentrations, and transcriptomic responses of the anterior kidney and skin to the infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 116 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 17%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,715,061
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,545
of 10,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,712
of 221,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#89
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,634 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.