↓ Skip to main content

Using crystallography, topology and graph set analysis for the description of the hydrogen bond network of triamterene: a rational approach to solid form selection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Chemistry, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using crystallography, topology and graph set analysis for the description of the hydrogen bond network of triamterene: a rational approach to solid form selection
Published in
BMC Chemistry, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13065-017-0293-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Hughes, Amit Delori, Abida Rehman, William Jones

Abstract

This study has demonstrated the use of crystallography, topology and graph set analysis in the description and classification of the complex hydrogen bonded network of triamterene. The aim is to give a brief overview of the methodology used to discuss the crystal structure of triamterene with a view to extending the study to include the solvates, cocrystals and salts of this compound. Graphical abstract One of the structurally significant dimers (supramolecular synthons) of triamterene identified by this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 45%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%