You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of a smartphone application for improving healthy lifestyles, a randomized clinical trial (EVIDENT II): study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José I Recio-Rodríguez, Carlos Martín-Cantera, Natividad González-Viejo, Amparo Gómez-Arranz, Maria S Arietaleanizbeascoa, Yolanda Schmolling-Guinovart, Jose A Maderuelo-Fernandez, Diana Pérez-Arechaederra, Emiliano Rodriguez-Sanchez, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos, Luis García-Ortiz, on behalf the EVIDENT Group |
| Abstract |
New technologies could facilitate changes in lifestyle and improve public health. However, no large randomized, controlled studies providing scientific evidence of the benefits of their use have been made. The aims of this study are to develop and validate a smartphone application, and to evaluate the effect of adding this tool to a standardized intervention designed to improve adherence to the Mediterranean diet and to physical activity. An evaluation is also made of the effect of modifying habits upon vascular structure and function, and therefore on arterial aging. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mongolia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 333 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 21% |
| Unknown | 77 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 16% |
| Psychology | 24 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 89 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2014.
All research outputs
#2,542,792
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,887
of 14,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,685
of 221,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#52
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.