↓ Skip to main content

Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2563-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Guilherme Ribeiro de Carvalho, Ana Paula Pierre de Moraes, Lilian Maria Sobreira Tanaka, Renato Vieira Gomes, Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva

Abstract

There is an increasing need for standardized instruments for quality assessment that are able to reflect the actual conditions of the intensive care practices, especially in low and middle-income countries. The aim of this article is to describe the preparation of an instrument for quality assessment of adult intensive care services adapted to the actual conditions of intensive care in a middle-income country and comprising indicators validated in the literature. The study consisted of five steps: (1) a literature survey; (2) a discussion with specialists by consensus method; (3) a pilot field test; (4) a description of indicators; and (5) an elaboration of the final version of the instrument. Each generated indicator was attributed a score ("out of standard" = 0; "below standard" = 1; "standard" = 2) that allowed calculation of the total score for each service assessed. A total of 62 indicators were constructed, distributed as follows: 38 structure indicators (physical structure: 4; human resources: 14; continued education and training: 2; protocols and routines: 12; material resources: 6); 17 process indicators (safety: 7; work: 10); and seven outcome indicators. The maximum possible total score was 124. Possible future applications of the instrument for the assessment of intensive care units that was constructed in the present study include benchmarking, multicenter studies, self-assessment of intensive care units, and evaluation of changes resulting from interventions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Lecturer 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 25%
Philosophy 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%