↓ Skip to main content

(Dis)Trust your gut: the gut microbiome in age-related inflammation, health, and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
(Dis)Trust your gut: the gut microbiome in age-related inflammation, health, and disease
Published in
Microbiome, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0296-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas W. Buford

Abstract

Chronic inflammation represents one of the most consistent biologic features of aging. However, the precise etiology of persistent low-grade increases in inflammation remains unclear. Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiome may play a key role in age-related inflammation. Indeed, several studies have indicated that older adults display an altered composition of the gut microbiota, and early evidence indicates that this dysbiosis is associated with the presence of several key circulating inflammatory analytes. The present review summarizes knowledge on age-related inflammation and discusses how potential relationships with gut dysbiosis may lead to novel treatment strategies in the future."The pattern of disease is an expression of the response of man to his total environment (physical, biological, and social); this response is, therefore, determined by anything that affects man himself or his environment." - Rene Dubos, 1961.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Student > Master 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Other 19 5%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 84 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 107 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#665,177
of 19,225,771 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#203
of 1,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,949
of 277,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,225,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.