You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endotype‐driven treatment in chronic upper airway diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-017-0157-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Glynnis De Greve, Peter W. Hellings, Wytske J. Fokkens, Benoit Pugin, Brecht Steelant, Sven F. Seys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Romania | 2 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,673,618
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#152
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,783
of 327,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.