You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Back to Bermuda: how is science best served?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-105 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deanna M Church, LaDeana W Hillier |
Abstract |
The independent announcements of two bovine genome assemblies from the same data suggest it is time to revisit the spirit of the Bermuda and Fort Lauderdale agreements and determine the policies for data release and distribution that will best serve both the producers of the data and the users. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 27% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
Norway | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 27% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 87% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,932
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,445
of 106,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#20
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.