You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A compilation of research working groups on drug utilisation across Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mònica Sabaté, Juan Fernando Pacheco, Elena Ballarín, Pili Ferrer, Hans Petri, Joerg Hasford, Marieke Wilma Schoonen, Marietta Rottenkolber, Joan Fortuny, Joan-Ramon Laporte, Luisa Ibáñez |
| Abstract |
The assessment of the benefit-risk of medicines needs careful consideration concerning their patterns of utilization. Systems for the monitoring of medicines consumption have been established in many European countries, and several international groups have identified and described them. No other compilation of European working groups has been published. As part of the PROTECT project, as a first step in searching for European data sources on the consumption of five selected groups of medicines, we aimed to identify and describe the main characteristics of the existing collaborative European working groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,710,226
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,783
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,837
of 221,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#37
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.