↓ Skip to main content

The role of psychosocial working conditions on burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion – a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of psychosocial working conditions on burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion – a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-9-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Seidler, Marleen Thinschmidt, Stefanie Deckert, Francisca Then, Janice Hegewald, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Steffi G Riedel-Heller

Abstract

To analyze the association between psychosocial working conditions and burnout and its core component emotional exhaustion, a systematic literature review was undertaken including cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 309 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 13%
Researcher 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 87 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 94 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#115
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,641
of 235,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.