↓ Skip to main content

Administration and burden of subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis in clinical practice in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Administration and burden of subcutaneous immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis in clinical practice in Canada
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-10-s1-a10
Authors

Steven W Blume, Karen Yeomans, Harold Kim, Sunning Tao, Stephanie M Hubbard, Felicia Allen-Ramey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#596
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,214
of 236,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#16
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.