↓ Skip to main content

Undergraduate research in medical education: a descriptive study of students’ views

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Undergraduate research in medical education: a descriptive study of students’ views
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiano C Oliveira, Renata C de Souza, Érika H Sassaki Abe, Luís E Silva Móz, Lidia R de Carvalho, Maria AC Domingues

Abstract

Medical students engage in curricular and extracurricular activities, including undergraduate research (UR). The advantages, difficulties and motivations for medical students pursuing research activities during their studies have rarely been addressed. In Brazil, some medical schools have included undergraduate research into their curriculum. The present study aimed to understand the reality of scientific practice among medical students at a well-established Brazilian medical school, analyzing this context from the students' viewpoint.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 21%
Student > Master 19 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 53%
Psychology 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,640,915
of 24,248,886 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#416
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,999
of 248,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#12
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,248,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.