You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of interventions to improve the health and housing status of homeless people: a rapid systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-638 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Rebecca Ganann, Shari Krishnaratne, Donna Ciliska, Fiona Kouyoumdjian, Stephen W Hwang |
Abstract |
Research on interventions to positively impact health and housing status of people who are homeless has received substantially increased attention over the past 5 years. This rapid review examines recent evidence regarding interventions that have been shown to improve the health of homeless people, with particular focus on the effect of these interventions on housing status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 47% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
India | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 418 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 85 | 20% |
Researcher | 68 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 11% |
Other | 29 | 7% |
Other | 71 | 17% |
Unknown | 73 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 96 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 11% |
Psychology | 40 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
Other | 46 | 11% |
Unknown | 91 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#487,052
of 24,583,586 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#442
of 16,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,732
of 124,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#3
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,583,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.