You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of the international forum on evidence informed health policymaking: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia – 27 to 31 August 2012
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-12-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin Neves, John N Lavis, Ulysses Panisset, Markus Hultstrand Klint |
| Abstract |
Meetings and conferences are often used as a tool to disseminate information, network with colleagues, and/or set direction for a field of study, but there is little evidence to support whether such events achieve their objectives. This study evaluates the International Forum on Evidence Informed Health Policymaking (EIHP), a three-day meeting held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2012, to determine the success of the meeting based on pre-determined objectives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Decision Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,986,882
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#828
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,074
of 230,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.