Title |
Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-149 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wendy V Norman, Janusz Kaczorowski, Judith A Soon, Rollin Brant, Stirling Bryan, Konia J Trouton, Lyda Dicus |
Abstract |
We describe the rationale and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether intrauterine contraception placed immediately after a second trimester abortion will result in fewer pregnancies than current recommended practice of intended placement at 4 weeks post-abortion. Decision analysis suggests the novel strategy could substantially reduce subsequent unintended pregnancies and abortions. This paper highlights considerations of design, implementation and evaluation of a trial expected to provide rigorous evidence for appropriate insertion timing and health economics of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |