↓ Skip to main content

Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immediate vs. delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wendy V Norman, Janusz Kaczorowski, Judith A Soon, Rollin Brant, Stirling Bryan, Konia J Trouton, Lyda Dicus

Abstract

We describe the rationale and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether intrauterine contraception placed immediately after a second trimester abortion will result in fewer pregnancies than current recommended practice of intended placement at 4 weeks post-abortion. Decision analysis suggests the novel strategy could substantially reduce subsequent unintended pregnancies and abortions. This paper highlights considerations of design, implementation and evaluation of a trial expected to provide rigorous evidence for appropriate insertion timing and health economics of intrauterine contraception after second trimester abortion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 11 15%