↓ Skip to main content

Diets containing traditional and novel green leafy vegetables improve liver fatty acid profiles of spontaneously hypertensive rats

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diets containing traditional and novel green leafy vegetables improve liver fatty acid profiles of spontaneously hypertensive rats
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-511x-12-168
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa Johnson, Ralphenia D Pace, Norma L Dawkins, Kyle R Willian

Abstract

The consumption of green leafy vegetables (GLVs) has been demonstrated to reduce the risks associated with cardiovascular and other diseases. However, no literature exists that examines the influence of traditional and novel GLVs on the liver fatty acid profile of an animal model genetically predisposed to developing hypertension. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of diets containing 4% collard greens, purslane or sweet potato greens on the liver fatty acid profiles of four-week old male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs, N = 44). Following four weeks consumption of the diets, liver fatty acid profiles were determined by gas-liquid chromatography of transesterified fatty acid methyl esters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 24%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,199,496
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#668
of 1,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,143
of 216,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.