↓ Skip to main content

Neighbourhood green space, physical function and participation in physical activities among elderly men: the Caerphilly Prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neighbourhood green space, physical function and participation in physical activities among elderly men: the Caerphilly Prospective study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Gong, John Gallacher, Stephen Palmer, David Fone

Abstract

The built environment in which older people live plays an important role in promoting or inhibiting physical activity. Most work on this complex relationship between physical activity and the environment has excluded people with reduced physical function or ignored the difference between groups with different levels of physical function. This study aims to explore the role of neighbourhood green space in determining levels of participation in physical activity among elderly men with different levels of lower extremity physical function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 255 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 45 17%
Unknown 62 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 11%
Environmental Science 21 8%
Psychology 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Other 64 25%
Unknown 79 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,285,428
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#448
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,531
of 236,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#8
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.