↓ Skip to main content

The West African experience in establishing steering committees for better collaboration between researchers and decision-makers to increase the use of health research findings

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The West African experience in establishing steering committees for better collaboration between researchers and decision-makers to increase the use of health research findings
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12961-017-0216-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namoudou Keita, Virgil Lokossou, Abdramane Berthe, Issiaka Sombie, Ermel Johnson, Kofi Busia

Abstract

Aware of the advantages of a project steering committee (SC) in terms of influencing the development of evidence-based health policies, the West African Health Organisation (WAHO) encouraged and supported the creation of such SCs around four research projects in four countries (Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Senegal and Sierra Leone). This study was conducted to describe the process that was used to establish these committees and its findings aim to assist other stakeholders in initiating this type of process. This is a cross-sectional, qualitative study of the initiative's four projects. In addition to a literature review and a review of the project documents, an interview guide was used to collect data from 14 members of the SCs, research teams, WAHO and the International Development Research Center. The respondents were selected with a view to reaching data saturation. The technique of thematic analysis by simple categorisation was used. To set up the SCs, a research team in each country worked with health authorities to identify potential members, organise meetings with these members and sought the authorities' approval to formalise the SCs. The SCs' mission was to provide technical assistance to the researchers during the implementation phase and to facilitate the transfer and use of the findings. The 'doing by learning' approach used by each research team, combined with WAHO's catalytic role with each country's Ministry of Health, helped each SC manage its contextual difficulties and function effectively. The involvement of technical and financial partners motivated the researchers and ministries of health, who, in turn, motivated other actors to volunteer on the SCs. The 'doing by learning' approach made it possible to develop strategies adapted to each context to create, facilitate and operate each SC and manage its difficulties. To reproduce such an experience, a strong understanding of the local context and the involvement of strong partners are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 13%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,469,838
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1,098
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,718
of 312,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#28
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.