You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Evolutionary cognitive therapy versus standard cognitive therapy for depression: a protocol for a blinded, randomized, superiority clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-15-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cezar Giosan, Oana Cobeanu, Cristina Mogoase, Vlad Muresan, Loretta S Malta, Katarzyna Wyka, Aurora Szentagotai |
| Abstract |
Depression is estimated to become the leading cause of disease burden globally by 2030. Despite existing efficacious treatments (both medical and psychotherapeutic), a large proportion of patients do not respond to therapy. Recent insights from evolutionary psychology suggest that, in addition to targeting the proximal causes of depression (for example, targeting dysfunctional beliefs by cognitive behavioral therapy), the distal or evolutionary causes (for example, inclusive fitness) should also be addressed. A randomized superiority trial is conducted to develop and test an evolutionary-driven cognitive therapy protocol for depression, and to compare its efficacy against standard cognitive therapy for depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |