You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is expert opinion reliable when estimating transition probabilities? The case of HCV-related cirrhosis in Egypt
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony Cousien, Dorothée Obach, Sylvie Deuffic-Burban, Aya Mostafa, Gamal Esmat, Valérie Canva, Mohamed El Kassas, Mohammad El-Sayed, Wagida A Anwar, Arnaud Fontanet, Mostafa K Mohamed, Yazdan Yazdanpanah |
| Abstract |
Data on HCV-related cirrhosis progression are scarce in developing countries in general, and in Egypt in particular. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of death and transition between different health stages of HCV (compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma) for an Egyptian population of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,777,143
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,439
of 2,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,281
of 243,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.