You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving perceptions of healthy food affordability: results from a pilot intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-11-33 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren K Williams, Gavin Abbott, Lukar E Thornton, Anthony Worsley, Kylie Ball, David Crawford |
| Abstract |
Despite strong empirical support for the association between perceived food affordability and dietary intake amongst families with a lower socioeconomic position (SEP), there is limited evidence of the most effective strategies for promoting more positive perceptions of healthy food affordability among this group. This paper reports findings from a pilot intervention that aimed to improve perceptions of healthy food affordability amongst mothers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Australia | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,788,799
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,192
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,607
of 235,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#17
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.