↓ Skip to main content

A child with hypertension and ambiguous genitalia – an uncommon variant of congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A child with hypertension and ambiguous genitalia – an uncommon variant of congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1341-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek Pant, Suman Baral, Bishal Shrestha, Arjun Tumbapo

Abstract

Deficiency in 11β-hydroxylase as a cause of congenital adrenal hyperplasia is uncommon. It should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypertension with virilization in any prepubescent child. A 12-year-old Asian boy from eastern Nepal presented with pain in his abdomen and hypertension. He was raised as a male but had absent testicles since birth and had precocious puberty. Plasma testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone were below baseline level. Basal 17-hydroxyprogesterone was elevated. Magnetic resonance imaging of his pelvis showed presence of Müllerian structures and karyotyping revealed 46,XX genotype. A clinical diagnosis of 11β-hydroxylase deficiency was made in view of hypertension with severe virilization in a 46,XX individual. Our patient's legal guardian was unwilling for our patient to change gender and because our patient is underage, the condition was well explained to his parents. He was managed with steroids and antihypertensive drugs. He was on regular follow-up; after 2 years there was no hypertension but he developed true puberty with functional ovaries. He was prescribed leuprolide (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue), letrozole (aromatase inhibitor), and a continuation of antihypertensive drugs. This case highlights the importance of a thorough physical examination of the external genitalia at birth and appropriate referral, and addresses issues in the management of such a disorder. Ethical issues pertaining to consent and who is entitled to give it should be clear so that the affected individual will have optimal psychological development and quality of life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#20,434,884
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#3,507
of 3,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,515
of 316,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#54
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,942 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.