You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-13-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kjersti Stokke, Nina R Olsen, Birgitte Espehaug, Monica W Nortvedt |
| Abstract |
Having a positive attitude towards evidence-based practice and being able to see the value of evidence-based practice for patients have been reported as important for the implementation of evidence-based practice among nurses.The aim of this study was to map self-reported beliefs towards EBP and EBP implementation among nurses, and to investigate whether there was a positive correlation between EBP beliefs and EBP implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 20% |
| Norway | 4 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 110 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 9% |
| Unknown | 78 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,822,011
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#43
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,720
of 238,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them