You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomized clinical trial to assess the influence of a three months training program (Gym-based individualized vs. Calisthenics-based non-invidualized) in COPD-patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-15-36 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timm Greulich, Katharina Kehr, Christoph Nell, Janine Koepke, Daniel Haid, Ulrich Koehler, Kay Koehler, Silke Filipovic, Klaus Kenn, Claus Vogelmeier, Andreas-Rembert Koczulla |
Abstract |
Pulmonary rehabilitation has been demonstrated to improve exercise capacity, dyspnoea, quality of life and to reduce the adverse effects of acute exacerbations. Current guidelines recommend exercise training in patients with mild to very severe disease. However, there is insufficient data comparing the efficacy of different training approaches and intensities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Canada | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 202 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 17% |
Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
Sports and Recreations | 18 | 9% |
Unspecified | 6 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 73 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,971,846
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#181
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,437
of 237,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.