↓ Skip to main content

Fructose in obesity and cognitive decline: is it the fructose or the excess energy?

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fructose in obesity and cognitive decline: is it the fructose or the excess energy?
Published in
Nutrition Journal, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Chiavaroli, Vanessa Ha, Russell J de Souza, Cyril WC Kendall, John L Sievenpiper

Abstract

We read with interest the review by Lakhan and Kirchgessner, proposing that high fructose intake promotes obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cognitive decline. Their focus on the role of fructose seems premature due to confounding from energy and the heavy reliance on low quality evidence from animal models. There is a lack of high quality evidence directly assessing the role of fructose in cognitive decline. Although one cannot exclude the possibility of a link, it remains an unconfirmed hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Social Sciences 7 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,029,669
of 25,383,278 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#491
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,820
of 233,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.