You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence: a systematic review revealing research gaps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-3-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabienne Boeni, Esther Spinatsch, Katja Suter, Kurt E Hersberger, Isabelle Arnet |
| Abstract |
This was a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Evidence mapping was used to reveal the effect of drug reminder packaging on medication adherence, to identify research gaps and to make suggestions for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#12,836,363
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,355
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,868
of 223,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.