You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are alternative livelihood projects effective at reducing local threats to specified elements of biodiversity and/or improving or maintaining the conservation status of those elements?: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-3-6 |
| Authors |
Dilys Roe, Mike Day, Francesca Booker, Wen Zhou, Sophie Allebone-Webb, Noëlle Kümpel, Nicholas A O Hill, Juliet Wright, Niki Rust, Terry CH Sunderland, Kent Redford, Gillian Petrokofsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 29% |
| Researcher | 29 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 53 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,162,058
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#151
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,560
of 238,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.