↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic analysis of pectin-related gene families in Physcomitrella patensand nine other plant species yields evolutionary insights into cell walls

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic analysis of pectin-related gene families in Physcomitrella patensand nine other plant species yields evolutionary insights into cell walls
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas W McCarthy, Joshua P Der, Loren A Honaas, Claude W dePamphilis, Charles T Anderson

Abstract

Pectins are acidic sugar-containing polysaccharides that are universally conserved components of the primary cell walls of plants and modulate both tip and diffuse cell growth. However, many of their specific functions and the evolution of the genes responsible for producing and modifying them are incompletely understood. The moss Physcomitrella patens is emerging as a powerful model system for the study of plant cell walls. To identify deeply conserved pectin-related genes in Physcomitrella, we generated phylogenetic trees for 16 pectin-related gene families using sequences from ten plant genomes and analyzed the evolutionary relationships within these families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,731,570
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#515
of 3,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,233
of 227,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.