↓ Skip to main content

PaCO2 and alveolar dead space are more relevant than PaO2/FiO2 ratio in monitoring the respiratory response to prone position in ARDS patients: a physiological study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PaCO2 and alveolar dead space are more relevant than PaO2/FiO2 ratio in monitoring the respiratory response to prone position in ARDS patients: a physiological study
Published in
Critical Care, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyril Charron, Xavier Repesse, Koceïla Bouferrache, Laurent Bodson, Samuel Castro, Bernard Page, François Jardin, Antoine Vieillard-Baron

Abstract

Our aims in this study were to report changes in the ratio of alveolar dead space to tidal volume (VDalv/VT) in the prone position (PP) and to test whether changes in partial pressure of arterial CO2 (PaCO2) may be more relevant than changes in the ratio of partial pressure of arterial O2 to fraction of inspired O2 (PaO2/FiO2) in defining the respiratory response to PP. We also aimed to validate a recently proposed method of estimation of the physiological dead space (VDphysiol/VT) without measurement of expired CO2.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Postgraduate 16 14%
Other 13 11%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 31 27%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,306,103
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,936
of 6,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,807
of 131,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#40
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.