You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rheumatology clinicians’ experiences of brief training and implementation of skills to support patient self-management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Dures, Sarah Hewlett, Nicholas Ambler, Remona Jenkins, Joyce Clarke, Rachael Gooberman-Hill |
| Abstract |
Self-management of arthritis requires informed, activated patients to manage its physical and psychosocial consequences. Patient activation and self-management can be enhanced through the use of cognitive-behavioural approaches, which have a strong evidence base and provide insight into the variation in outcome of patients with ostensibly the same degree of disease activity. However, training for rheumatology health professionals in theory and skills underpinning the facilitation of self-management is not widely available. To develop such training, this study explored rheumatology clinicians' experiences of a variety of brief skills training courses to understand which aspects were helpful or unhelpful, and to identify the barriers and facilitators of applying the skills in clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 73% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Psychology | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,115,926
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#816
of 4,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,373
of 224,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#19
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.