↓ Skip to main content

Metatranscriptome analysis of fungal strains Penicillium camemberti and Geotrichum candidumreveal cheese matrix breakdown and potential development of sensory properties of ripened Camembert-type…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metatranscriptome analysis of fungal strains Penicillium camemberti and Geotrichum candidumreveal cheese matrix breakdown and potential development of sensory properties of ripened Camembert-type cheese
Published in
BMC Genomics, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Hélène Lessard, Catherine Viel, Brian Boyle, Daniel St-Gelais, Steve Labrie

Abstract

Camembert-type cheese ripening is driven mainly by fungal microflora including Geotrichum candidum and Penicillium camemberti. These species are major contributors to the texture and flavour of typical bloomy rind cheeses. Biochemical studies showed that G. candidum reduces bitterness, enhances sulphur flavors through amino acid catabolism and has an impact on rind texture, firmness and thickness, while P. camemberti is responsible for the white and bloomy aspect of the rind, and produces enzymes involved in proteolysis and lipolysis activities. However, very little is known about the genetic determinants that code for these activities and their expression profile over time during the ripening process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,172,995
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#4,751
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,773
of 224,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#53
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.