You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Introgressive hybridization and latitudinal admixture clines in North Atlantic eels
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-14-61 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sébastien Wielgoss, Aude Gilabert, Axel Meyer, Thierry Wirth |
Abstract |
Hybridization, the interbreeding of diagnosably divergent species, is a major focus in evolutionary studies. Eels, both from North America and Europe migrate through the Atlantic to mate in a vast, overlapping area in the Sargasso Sea. Due to the lack of direct observation, it is unknown how these species remain reproductively isolated. The detection of inter-species hybrids in Iceland suggests on-going gene flow, but few studies to date have addressed the influence of introgression on genetic differentiation in North Atlantic eels. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 38% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,818
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,206
of 238,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#49
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.