↓ Skip to main content

Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-10-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fasil Tekola, Susan Bull, Bobbie Farsides, Melanie J Newport, Adebowale Adeyemo, Charles N Rotimi, Gail Davey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Social Sciences 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,534,941
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#623
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,348
of 102,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them