You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LabKey Server: An open source platform for scientific data integration, analysis and collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-12-71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth K Nelson, Britt Piehler, Josh Eckels, Adam Rauch, Matthew Bellew, Peter Hussey, Sarah Ramsay, Cory Nathe, Karl Lum, Kevin Krouse, David Stearns, Brian Connolly, Tom Skillman, Mark Igra |
| Abstract |
Broad-based collaborations are becoming increasingly common among disease researchers. For example, the Global HIV Enterprise has united cross-disciplinary consortia to speed progress towards HIV vaccines through coordinated research across the boundaries of institutions, continents and specialties. New, end-to-end software tools for data and specimen management are necessary to achieve the ambitious goals of such alliances. These tools must enable researchers to organize and integrate heterogeneous data early in the discovery process, standardize processes, gain new insights into pooled data and collaborate securely. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 203 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 83 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 34% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 8% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,086,210
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#560
of 7,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,172
of 108,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.