↓ Skip to main content

Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm design in mammals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sperm competition and the evolution of sperm design in mammals
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximiliano Tourmente, Montserrat Gomendio, Eduardo RS Roldan

Abstract

The influence of sperm competition upon sperm size has been a controversial issue during the last 20 years which remains unresolved for mammals. The hypothesis that, when ejaculates compete with rival males, an increase in sperm size would make sperm more competitive because it would increase sperm swimming speed, has generated contradictory results from both theoretical and empirical studies. In addition, the debate has extended to which sperm components should increase in size: the midpiece to accommodate more mitochondria and produce more energy to fuel motility, or the principal piece to generate greater propulsion forces.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 176 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Bachelor 35 18%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 14 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 27 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,346,181
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#901
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,646
of 192,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.